Wall Street Journal's "Best of the Web Today" is a daily read for me. Always fresh, informative and witty. Yesterday, they walked around the city talking to protestors.
The Canadian guy was actually pleasant and earnest, and we ended up chatting with him at some length. At one point he theorized that there was a connection between the savings-and-loan scandal of the late 1980s and the Gulf War of 1990-91--i.e., that the first Bush administration had engineered the latter as a distraction from the former.
We thought we had a pretty good counterargument. "There were two events that preceded the Gulf War," we noted: "the S&L scandal and Iraq's invasion of Kuwait. I can see the connection between the invasion and the war, but I can't see the connection between the S&L scandal and the war."
He responded with a long disquisition about Iraq's legitimate grievances against Kuwait--something about "angular drilling" to steal Iraqi oil--his point being that, although he didn't approve of the invasion, it was not wholly unprovoked.
We listened patiently, then asked, "What does that have to do with the S&L scandal?"
"OK, I was reaching," he admitted. "Maybe there wasn't a connection." This certainly restored our faith in the power of civil debate and sweet reason.
This guy managed to kill off his own conspiracy theory. Maybe there's hope?
And another example of the extreme left's paranoia.